Hilton's strategy centers on increasing water storage, expanding infrastructure like dams and reservoirs, and reducing environmental regulations he believes hinder water delivery to farms and cities. He supports projects such as the Sites Reservoir and raising the Shasta dam, aligning with agricultural interests like the Westlands Water District. Hilton, however, opposes the Delta tunnel project.
Becerra, on the other hand, has not detailed specific water policies. His campaign spokesperson stated that as governor, Becerra would prioritize modernizing water infrastructure, ensuring safe drinking water, and supporting agricultural and business water needs. Becerra has indicated a preference for bringing stakeholders together to find solutions.
Water experts offer varied perspectives on the candidates' approaches. Some view Becerra's deliberative style as beneficial for a complex issue, while others question the feasibility of Hilton's ambitious infrastructure plans and deregulation proposals, noting that abundant water often comes at a cost paid by others.
The candidates' differing visions come at a critical time for California, as groundwater overuse, sinking land, and the decline of industries like fishing highlight the urgency of effective water management. Public opinion polls indicate that voters are more likely to support candidates who prioritize water reliability and affordability.