The proposition allocates funds to several key areas: $7.2 billion for acquiring, building, or renovating apartment buildings, with a portion reserved for low-income households and supportive housing for the homeless. This segment alone could help support up to 40,000 rental units. Additionally, $1.25 billion is earmarked for helping veterans secure home loans, and $1.1 billion for low and moderate-income households to purchase homes.

Further funding includes $500 million for infrastructure supporting new housing, such as water and transportation improvements. The bond also designates $450 million for farmworker housing, $350 million for student housing at UC and CSU campuses, and $200 million in grants for tribes to develop housing. Another $200 million will support pilot projects for low-cost housing developed by cities and counties.

Repayment of the bond is estimated to cost the state between $500 million and $600 million annually for approximately 25 years, funded by the state's general fund. The portion for veteran housing is designed to be self-repaid through loan payments from participating veterans. Critics, however, question the reliance on bond financing and argue that only a small fraction of the funds are directly allocated to veterans, despite the bond's name.

Supporters, including housing developers, veterans groups, and legislative leaders, emphasize the urgent need for investment, pointing to stalled projects that lack sufficient funding. Opponents, primarily Republican legislators, express concerns about increasing state debt and suggest alternative methods for housing development.