This action follows LA28's rejection of a previous request for similar information made by Mejia's office approximately two and a half weeks prior. Mejia stated that the information is contractually obligated to be provided to the city under the 2021 agreement governing the relationship between LA28 and the host city.
LA28 spokesperson Jacie Prieto Lopez indicated that the organization had not yet received the subpoena and therefore could not provide a formal response. She expressed disappointment, suggesting that the city's actions were diverting attention from the essential work of preparing Los Angeles for the Games.
Mejia emphasized his responsibility to protect taxpayer dollars and assess the city's financial exposure from hosting the Olympics. The subpoena aims to ensure transparency regarding spending and revenue as the city could be liable for significant losses if the Games do not break even, with the city covering the first $270 million and any amount over $540 million.
Previous reviews by The Times and city officials have noted that LA28's annual reports have sometimes provided vague or incomplete information, particularly concerning venue progress and contracts exceeding $1 million. LA28 had previously cited potential competitive and partnership risks as reasons for withholding some contract details.